Monetary and Fiscal Policy Interactions in Closed and Open Economies: An IS–LM and Mundell–Fleming Perspective
Abstract
Monetary and fiscal policies are fundamental tools in modern macroeconomic management. Their effectiveness, however, depends on whether an economy is closed or open, as well as on the exchange-rate regime in the case of open economies. This paper analyzes these interactions using the IS–LM model for closed economies and the Mundell–Fleming model for open economies. It explores the short-run dynamics of fiscal and monetary policy under floating and fixed exchange rates and considers implications for large open economies, highlighting how international capital mobility, interest rates, and exchange-rate adjustments alter policy effectiveness.
Introduction
Macroeconomic policy aims to stabilize output, employment, and prices while promoting long-term economic growth. Two main instruments are fiscal policy—government decisions on taxation and spending—and monetary policy—central bank actions that influence the money supply and interest rates. Their impact varies based on the structural openness of the economy and the exchange-rate system in place.
In closed economies, the IS–LM model serves as the primary analytical tool to explain the interaction between goods and money markets (Blanchard & Johnson, 2013). For open economies, particularly those with high capital mobility, the Mundell–Fleming model extends IS–LM analysis by incorporating international trade and finance (Mankiw, 2021). These models provide insights into how fiscal and monetary interventions affect income, interest rates, exchange rates, and trade flows in the short run.
Fiscal and Monetary Policy in a Closed Economy: The IS–LM Model
In a closed economy, fiscal and monetary policies affect national income and interest rates through interactions between the goods market (IS curve) and the money market (LM curve).
Fiscal Policy
An increase in government purchases (G) shifts the IS curve to the right, raising national income (Y). However, higher income increases money demand, pushing interest rates upward, which reduces investment—a phenomenon known as crowding out (Dornbusch et al., 2011). Similarly, a tax cut increases disposable income and consumption, shifting the IS curve rightward but again facing partial offset through higher interest rates.
Monetary Policy
An increase in the money supply (M) lowers interest rates by shifting the LM curve downward. This encourages investment, raising income and output. Thus, monetary policy primarily operates through the interest rate–investment channel, making it an effective stabilizing tool in a closed economy (Mankiw, 2021).
Policy in a Small Open Economy: The Mundell–Fleming Model
The Mundell–Fleming model applies to small open economies with perfect capital mobility, where the domestic interest rate aligns with the world interest rate. Its predictions depend critically on whether the exchange rate is floating or fixed.
Floating Exchange Rates
Fiscal Policy: Fiscal expansion initially increases demand, shifting IS* rightward. However, capital inflows appreciate the domestic currency, reducing net exports and offsetting the expansion. Hence, fiscal policy is ineffective under floating exchange rates.
Monetary Policy: An increase in the money supply lowers interest rates, causing capital outflow and currency depreciation. The weaker currency boosts net exports, making monetary policy highly effective.
Trade Policy: Trade restrictions, such as tariffs, shift IS* rightward but induce currency appreciation, which offsets net export gains. Thus, trade policy affects exchange rates but not output.
Fixed Exchange Rates
Fiscal Policy: Fiscal expansion shifts IS* rightward. To maintain the fixed exchange rate, the central bank expands the money supply, shifting LM* rightward and amplifying income growth. Fiscal policy is therefore powerful under fixed regimes.
Monetary Policy: Attempts to expand money supply are neutralized by central bank interventions to maintain the peg, rendering monetary policy ineffective.
Trade Policy: Trade restrictions shift IS* rightward, and central bank interventions expand LM* to maintain the peg. The result is higher income and improved trade balance.
Policy in a Large Open Economy
In large open economies like the United States, which influence world interest rates, outcomes differ from the small-open-economy case. Fiscal expansion increases both income and interest rates, but higher interest rates attract foreign capital, appreciating the currency and reducing net exports. Monetary expansion lowers interest rates and depreciates the currency, stimulating both investment and exports. Hence, monetary policy is especially potent, while fiscal multipliers are smaller than in a closed economy (Krugman & Obstfeld, 2018).
Conclusion
The effectiveness of fiscal and monetary policies depends on whether an economy is closed or open and, in the case of open economies, on its exchange-rate regime. In closed economies, both fiscal and monetary policy influence income and interest rates, though crowding out limits fiscal effects. In open economies, floating exchange rates make fiscal policy ineffective but enhance monetary policy, while fixed regimes reverse this relationship. For large economies, both policies affect domestic and international markets, requiring policymakers to consider trade-offs between growth, exchange-rate stability, and external balances. The IS–LM and Mundell–Fleming frameworks thus remain essential tools for understanding short-run policy interactions in different macroeconomic contexts.
References
Blanchard, O., & Johnson, D. R. (2013). Macroeconomics (6th ed.). Pearson.
Dornbusch, R., Fischer, S., & Startz, R. (2011). Macroeconomics (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Krugman, P., & Obstfeld, M. (2018). International economics: Theory and policy (11th ed.). Pearson.
Mankiw, N. G. (2021). Principles of macroeconomics (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.