The Paradox of Thrift

 

The Paradox of Thrift

The paradox of thrift is a concept proposed by John Maynard Keynes during the great depression in 1930 that states that when individuals and households try to save more money, they may actually end up reducing economic growth and increasing unemployment. The idea behind the paradox of thrift is that when people save more money, they are also reducing their consumption, which leads to a decrease in aggregate demand. This decrease in aggregate demand can cause firms to reduce production and lay off workers, which leads to an increase in unemployment.

Classical economists generally view saving as a positive aspect of economic activity. They argue that saving allows for the accumulation of capital, which can then be used for investment and ultimately leads to economic growth and development. Additionally, classical economists believe that saving is a virtue in and of itself, as it demonstrates self-discipline and restraint. They argue that individuals who save are more likely to be responsible and productive members of society.

To understand the paradox of thrift, it's important to consider the role of consumption and investment in the economy. Consumption is the spending by households on goods and services, while investment is the spending by firms on things like new machinery, factories, and buildings. In a closed economy, the total spending by households and firms is equal to the total income earned by households and firms. If households choose to save more, the total spending will decrease, and firms will have to reduce production and lay off workers.

The Paradox of thrift is represented in a graph, with the saving function on the vertical axis and the income on the horizontal axis. The saving function is represented by a negatively sloped line, showing that as income increases, saving also increases but decreases. The equilibrium point is represented by the intersection of the saving and investment line. If people decide to save more, the saving function will shift upward, income will decrease and the economy will go into recession.

When the economy is at point E1, the intersection of the saving (S1) and investment (I) curves forms an equilibrium, with an income level of Y1. However, if society increases its saving and the saving curve shifts from S1 to S2, the equilibrium point also shifts to E2. This results in a decrease in the level of income, from Y1 to Y2. This phenomenon suggests that if society saves more, both income and saving decrease. Thus, the theory of the paradox of thrift states that saving, in this scenario, is not always a virtue.

In summary, the paradox of thrift states that when individuals and households try to save more money, they may actually end up reducing economic growth and increasing unemployment. This happens because when people save more money, they are also reducing their consumption, which leads to a decrease in aggregate demand and a reduction in production and employment.

You can see the presentation here.